The No Child Left Behind act of 2001 Essays -- Education, Bush Adminis

The No tike Left Behind figure of 2001Control of the public education system has been left to the State for close to of the countrys history, it was not until the 1950s that the federal governing body contend a role in categorical programs, only if the national government refrained from involvement in academics until the 90s. Three days after victorious up his position in office, George Bush announced his plan for the No Child Left Behind act (NCLB) which was a consolidated restore of the 1962 Elementary and Secondary Education Act or ESEA (McGuinn, p. 1). ESEA focused on providing resources for the underprivileged students, whereas the NCLB act focuses on all students in public schools. On January 8, 2002, the No Child Left Behind act was enacted. The law increase federal education spending, required states to design and administer proficiency screen to all students grades three and up, demanded that States put qualified teachers in every furcate room, and promised to hol d all States accountable for the performance of their public schools (McGuinn, p. 1). The act itself is what was mat to be a radical for the failure of properly educating Americas children. How the act is put in to action, and if it serves its purpose, has depended on the States requirements and statistics. Public education was belatedly decreasing in quality, consequently, failing Americas children, and a effect was needed. According to author, and Chair of the K-12 Education Task Force, Chester Finn Jr. No Child Left Behind arose from the premise that Americas public schools werent doing well enough and states ought not to be left to their own devices to improve them. So Uncle Sam created a new web of requirements, incentives, and sanctions aimed at boosting school perfo... ...m birth through kickoff and beyond (Carter, 2010). The No Child Left Behind act was created to break dance public schools and it did. Like most laws, though, an update is necessary to keep up with th e times and serve its purpose of aiding the American people. Government programs have a reputation of failing because of the lack of funding, but when the people come unitedly for something as important as education, failure is not an option. Americas future relies on the children of today, so education should remain a anteriority of this countries government. There will never be an all pleasing solution the need to complain will exist no matter what is done, but this does not mean the government should step away. The law was a rear created to support the States and aid in academic success, therefore the law does not need to be negated, just reformed and improved.